X-eGroups-Msg-Info:
1:12:0
From: "Earl Freeman"
<erfreeman@adelphia.net>
X-Yahoo-Profile: platinums6
Sender: Practiceimprovement1@yahoogroups.com
Mailing-List: list
Practiceimprovement1@yahoogroups.com; contact
Practiceimprovement1-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To: mailing list
Practiceimprovement1@yahoogroups.com
List-Id: <Practiceimprovement1.yahoogroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:Practiceimprovement1-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 20:51:28 -0400
Subject: RE: [Practiceimprovement1] Administrative
burden and best practice
Reply-To: Practiceimprovement1@yahoogroups.com
Gordon,
Sounds like a good idea.
After
30+ years of a more conventional small town practice with from 2-3 employees,
your inital idea of solo pracitce, Gordon, sounded pretty good. So 18
months ago, I went off in the same town by myself with no employees. I
try to keep my days to about 12 patients but it usually turns out to be more like
17+. So the administrative stuff usually gets done in the evening and
weekends; and I get behind and I’m sure I’ve let a significant amount of money
get through the cracks. I have found a company in
So far (18 months), so good, but it has used more time than I expected. I under-estimated my time requirement and got behind – some of “today’s work didn’t get done today”. Catching up is a lot more time-consuming than “today”. However, having started a practice 3 previous times, either because of family necessities or because of changes in partnerships, I guess having too much business in less than 18 months is sort of good thing. I’m convinced that you are correct, that various functions and procedures can be streamlined to substantially better efficiency. One of the issues that I deal with is that this type of practice is particularly satisfying to patients; therefore they talk to their friends and I’ve had to become a bit hard-nosed about limiting and saying NO to new patients. I don’t participate in any HMO’s and other managed care plans, but I do process other insurances (I’m amazed at how many insurance companies are in my data base), I’m not a process nut so I’m kind of intrigued by your message.
Hm-m-m-m-m – “efficient processes” – let’s see where this one goes.
Bud Freeman